I’m always amazed (and intimidated) by how intelligent and
insightful the blog posts are every week. In comparison to the brilliance of my
classmates, I find myself frequently questioning the value of my input. Putting
that self-deprecating thought into the context of this week’s reflections, I
wonder why it is that I can’t meet my expectations of myself? Morgan Parr’s
post really resonated with me. How do I measure the gap that I see between my
intelligence and progress and that of my peers? What form does this system of measurement
take? Is this ‘”gap” quantifiable at all, or only qualitatively defined by how
I perceive its distance from day to day? Her connection between Barthe’s
concept of tmesis and our discussion of “the optimum” explains so much of the
dissatisfaction and insecurity we feel in comparing our lives to others. The
optimum can exist in many forms (media and capitalist consumption being the one
we spoke of in class), but I believe that there is a specific social optimum
through which we perceive the achievements of others as always being slightly
ahead of our own. In this sense the optimum is really never attainable. It
calls to mind for me Disney’s now antiquated Carousel of Progress, in which we
as a society are always striving toward something greater than even the
pinnacle of an age as it passes (from the invention of the automobile in the 19th
century to the invention of the computer, and then a glimpse into a predicted
future in which virtual reality supplements our own). This ties into Morgan Saunders’
post about the “accelerated American dream.” The idea of an ever-rolling
optimum increasing in speed as time and society progress is mirrored by the
ever-shifting definition of the American dream, and the evolution of an
American dream that is, as Morgan puts it, “unrealistic, unsustainable, and completely random.”
Yes, our constant need to strive toward this contrived pinnacle of success has
driven and continues to drive progress, but it also creates a definition of
success and happiness that is nearly impossible to attain. The concept of the
optimum is interesting, but even more so are the repercussions such a concept
has had not only on history, but continues to have on our own lives. I’m
interested by the idea that the optimum lives in the gap between how we
perceive ourselves, and that which we envy and desire in others.
No comments:
Post a Comment