Friday, December 4, 2015

Roger and Me: A Foucauldian Love Story

This week in class I shared my encounter with the enchanting and mysterious Roger. Pure boredom and a 4-hour drive led me down the path to 855-FOR-TRUTH, but the resulting hour long conversation was truly heaven ordained.  Run by GospelBillboards.org (do yourself a favor and listen to a few of their audio clips explaining the billboards, they're hilarious), the call service gives you the option to talk to a representative about any questions you may have and be told you're going to Hell free of charge! Obviously I wasn't about to let that opportunity pass me by, and soon enough I was on the line with someone who was soon to become a friend and confidant.

Roger was immediately charming - in his thick southern drawl, within the first 10 minutes he had compared my lifestyle to beastiality (I just looked that word up to see if I was spelling it correctly, which was INCREDIBLY dumb and I highly advise against EVER doing) and pedophilia. I posed (only occasionally sarcastic) questions for Roger about his beliefs and received increasingly outlandish and offensive answers. By the time I hung up, I was feeling amused but vaguely nauseous. Nothing he'd said was anything I hadn't heard before, but that didn't make it much better. Driving down I-75 you're barraged by these same messages over and over by billboard after billboard, but these messages certainly aren't limited to antiquated forms of media exposure. Scrolling through Facebook or surfing through channels on TV, it's never too hard to find some good ole' religious fundamentalism, almost always of the Christian variety.

Screencap from the Gospelbillboards website

Foucault's concept of surveillance is directly tied to our exposure to these messages everyday. In his words, “THE GAZE is alert everywhere.” Foucault believes that we're trapped in an ideological relationship with power, and I'd have to agree with him. So many of the ways we're entrenched in the power dynamics of ideology aren't as obvious as a 40 foot billboard along the highway - the way that ideology is conveyed is often much more insidious. Religious ideology has occupied and even guided our national rhetoric for so long, it has become essential to understanding how we perceive normalcy. I articulated in a previous blog post that were are being constantly scrutinized both by media and by each other to make sure we adhere to societal norms. Those that are seen as 'Other' are perceived as deviant and dangerous, and for years the solution to this danger has been to lock it out of sight, whether in a prison or mental institution.

Roger consistently referred to homosexuality as an illness throughout our conversation, something to be cured. In the context of today's more liberal media views, this might be shocking to some, but the correlation between queerness and mental illness still exists in our society. It has too much history to be shed so easily; homosexuality wasn't even declassified as a mental illness by the APA until 1973. People were still institutionalized (and frequently administered electroconvulsive therapy) less than 45 years ago - not nearly long enough time for the stigma to disappear. People like Roger act as vessels for the stigma to carry on and continue to be inscribed in expectations of behavior and of the body. As Foucault states, “Our society is one not of spectacle, but of surveillance.” Although blatant

homophobic media spectacles have become less common in recent years , surveillance on the basis of normative performances of sexuality and gender (among many other things) remain interactive and pervasive throughout society.


Roger just checkin up. What a sweetie.




2 comments:

  1. Hania I love your post. Coming from a very Catholic orthodox environment and from an extremely strict Opus Dei (only girls) High School, I can very much relate to your experience. As you said, Foucault states that “Our society is one not of spectacle, but of surveillance.” I guess surveillance is the only way for those in charge to make sure the herds are doing 'as they should'. This reminds me of the times back in my high school when we had to sneak around to read Marx's Manifesto and when our philosophy teacher had to teach us about those ideologies in the low-low. Before the first recess break we had around noon, we had a 'Study Period' of half an hour to 45 mins, where we could "choose" to either go to mass in the school's chapel or use that time to stay in class doing homework or pretty much whatever you wanted. It was supposed to be OUR choice, but every time Study Period was about to start the numeraries (women that are almost nuns but they have families and live in their houses) would stop by every class asking: "What is more important? Jesus or your homework", "Jesus died for you, wouldn't you want to give him 30 mins of your day?", "Oh, I guess you're too busy for Jesus, the man who loves you the most and gave everything for you...", "I bet when you are about to give an exam you ask him for help huh? But when he want's a minute of your day you don't have it..."
    After they realized very few people from my class were going to mass, they changed the "Study Period" to "READING Period." This consisted of the teacher reading a book to us and us following. We weren't allowed to work on our homework anymore, we weren't allowed to speak at all. Reading period sucked!
    My point is, that yes, we live under constant surveillance because those in power want us to follow what they want; and when we don't want to, they find a way to force us. Reading Period was so extremely boring that I would just go to church and sit there for half an hour so I didn't have to listen to a teacher reading a terrible book. Of course, the numerary came into my class saying she was happy to see that we all started going to church and that Jesus was very content with this...

    ReplyDelete